319
Planning
320
Planning
321
Planning
Planning
1 Reed et al. (2009) amalgamated in a table the different stakeholder analysis methods, including the resources
required, the level of stakeholder participation, and the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
322
323
Planning
324
Planning
Involvement needs
325
Planning
Stakeholders Interests Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities/ Relationships Impacts threats
Planning
INFLUENCE FACTORS
326
High influence Stakeholders may oppose the intervention; therefore, they should be kept informed and their views acknowledged to avoid disruption or conflict Consultation - Information
Stakeholders require special effort to ensure that their needs are met and their participation is meaningful Consultation - Empowerment
Stakeholders should be closely involved to ensure their support for the project Consultation - Collaboration Empowerment / Delegation
Planning
High interest
Low interest
Low influence Stakeholders are unlikely to be closely involved in the project and require not more than informationsharing aimed at the ‘general public’ Information
327
Influence
Planning
C3: Potential support or threat C4: Ability to get funding C5: Ownership of a potential treatment site
328
Interest C2: Political power
C1: Activity linked with FSM C6: Potential user of a treatment endproduct
Main interests
Opportunities
Involvement needs and required actions
Planning
Stakeholder categories
329
330
Planning
331
Planning
332
Planning
333
Figure 15.6
- international NGO
NGO2
Head of NGO3 is also head of the administration council of NGO1
Technical support
Advisors
Planning
- Solid waste collection and health projects
NGO4
- Manages one disposal site
NGO3
- Municipal mandate for the collection of solid waste from the main market
Use dry sludge from informal disposal site
- Sedentary and nomadic
Cattle breeders
- All year round or seasonal
Vegetable farmers + cereal cultivators
Endusers
Religious leaders
Neighbourhood leaders
Responsible for the management of ancestral land
Traditional leaders
Traditional authorities
Solid waste collection
Request for land
- Support to decentralisation process - Technical support
Latrine builders
- Used to come regularly from capital city - Owner of informal disposal site
Mechanical service provider2
- Comes once a month from capital city
Mechanical service provider1
Mayor Technical services
- Permanent residence - Latrine building and sludge emptying
NGO1
Sludge emptiers
Call for service
- Contract for public latrine management - Orders for emptying service made at City Council
Register to get service from MSP1
Municipal authorities
Example of a diagram of relationships between faecal sludge management stakeholders.
RD social affairs
RD health
RD plan & development
RD urbanism & habitat
RD hydraulics
RD public works
RD sanitation
RG = Regional Directorates
Regional and national authorities
Owners
Users
Households
Enforcement of national laws and regulations
Case Study 15.1 – Part I
Call for service
334
Planning
Criteria
Stakeholder
C1 Activity FSM
C2 Political power
C3 Support threath
C4 Funding
C5 Ownership site
C6 Enduse
Low influence
Mechanical service provider 1 Farmers Cattle breeders
Planning
Low interest High interest
High influence Regional Directorates Traditional authorities NGO2 Municipal authorities Households NGO1 Mechanical service provider 2 NGO3 NGO4
335
Planning
Stakeholders
336
Roles and responsibilities
Strengths
Weaknesses
Relationships
Involvement needs
Criteria C2 Political power
C3 Support threath
C4 Funding
C5 Ownership site
C6 Enduse
Planning
Stakeholder
C1 Activity FSM
337
High interest
Low interest
Low influence Cattle breeders
Mechanical service provider 1 Mechanical service provider 2 Farmers
Construction
Management
High influence Regional Directorates Traditional authorities NGO2 NGO3 NGO4 Municipal authorities Households NGO1
Valorisation
To be informed
Municipal authorities
Municipal authorities
Municipal authorities
Households
NGO 1
NGO 1
NGO 1
NGO 2
RD public works
Mechanical service provider 1
Farmers
NGO 3
Mechanical service provider 2
RD health
NGO 4
RD sanitation
Regional Directorates
Planning
Traditional authorities
338
339
Planning
340
Planning
