February 2015 Handout

2/17 /2015 Enrolled Agents Meeting February 2015 Joel A. Bernstein Attorney at Law 33 Bedford Street, Suite 13 Lexingto...

0 downloads 109 Views 1MB Size
2/17 /2015

Enrolled Agents Meeting February 2015 Joel A. Bernstein Attorney at Law 33 Bedford Street, Suite 13 Lexington, MA 02420 781 863-8606 www.jbernsteinlaw.com Email: [email protected]

1

2/17 /2015

Your speaker Estates and trusts 15 minutes of fame Loring and Rounds: A Trustee's Handbook 2000+ trusts and wills Post death administration Annual communication Website: www.jbernsteinlaw.com

Student • 45 minutes early a.m.

• Black cup of coffee (or 2) • Federal Income Taxation ofEstatesJ Trusts & Beneficiaries - CCH Ferguson, Freeland and Ascher

2

2/17 /2015

Attachments Administrative Trust excerpt from Loring and Rounds 2. David Gaw (CA) excerpt - Discuss Income Tax Issues 3. FAQs on Grantor Trust Tax Reporting 4. IRS GTR project 1.

Whiteboard

.

.. ·

. ..

3

2/17 /2015

Five parts 1.

$2 million couple $1 million up

Gifting in MA Grantor trust reporting Pesky Trust EIN issue 5. What type of trust given to EA? 2. 3. 4.

Part 1: Joe and Mary- $2 million assets

4

2/17 /2015

Couple with $2 million POST death scenarios: 1. 2. 3. 4.

No will or trust. Mary dies. Joe and Mary have revocable trusts. Mary dies. No will or trust. Medicaid?. Each have revocable trust. Medicaid?

Q: What are income tax and estate return issues?

Joe and Mary: Estate planning discussion •

Wills Discuss: how assets are owned? A Will make a difference?



Do nothing? But ... Durable power of attorney, Health care proxy, MOLST





Revocable trusts 'Nursing home?' • •

Give assets away/irrevocable trust Will with testamentary trust

5

2/17 /2015

Case 1: No will or trust, Mary dies How are the assets owned? Intestate - newer MUPC All to spouse - except if non-joint children • Joint • IRA • Life insurance Last return (1040) of couple Estate (1041) IF sole assets of deceased (Probate estate) • Gross income of probate estate over $600 • Taxable income of probate estate (after personal exemption)

Final return of decedent •

• •

"Death adds new dimensions to many of the usual problems in preparing an individual's tax return." Ferguson, Freeland and Ascher Shorter period of time - unmatched income/expenses By whom is the item reportable? • • • •

Decedent? Estate? Trust? Ultimate transferee?

6

2/17/2015

Maybe no estate at all All joint or beneficiary designation • But Mary died with some sole assets • F,F,A: File even if income de minimis • Statute of limitations - 3 year • Personal liability of PR - 1 year after assessment time of decedent • If no PR or trustee: Inadvertent executor

Where to file final return • District of PR, even if different from decedent's residence • "Mary, deceased" on top, with Mary SS# • Sign with fiduciary capacity or other relationship • JOINT RETURN: With Joe •

IF divorce was not final

7

2/17 /2015

Income includable on final return Only income decedent realized before death • Actually or constructively • Doctrines: claim of right, cash equivalence, constructive Accrual decedent: Familiar 'all events' test If not realized, then IRD taxable to ultimate recipient (IRC 691)

Estate 1041 Income from death forward Probate estate • Gross income of probate estate over $600 • Taxable income of probate estate (after personal exemption) • $600 personal exemption

8

2/17 /2015

706? $5,340,000 -> $5,430,000 • Increases each year

M706: $ 1 Million (Massachusetts) Thick - copies of will, trusts of Mary and] oe Snapshot of assets and liabilities at death

IF Mary died with $800,000 NoMAM706

• If died with $1.4 Million - yes, M706

9

2/17 /2015

IF Mary had $1.4 million ALL to spouse M706 attached U.S. 706 (July 1999) Marital deduction makes no tax due But all bunches into Joe's name MA estate tax when Joe dies

At Mary's death FormM.706 Masi;aetmietts Estate TaX Re!um

'°'"'"'°

c:::..-:::::I.4Q9]QQJ

Ii"• roo,

'I T«ol !If~ o;1olo. Ent.r lllo """'""Wotn Ito ,)ufy l~~~ ;, E!1iertl'Iii" 1. llrrn JO:. lftiH>i r>lun;;for l~t ostcl~ol o um..,~u•Ofl• l'Mltl\jnl •rt< 2 ~r,;l 4 •ml Nrll Pm-2

•"rt


Though no MA estate tax, ALL in name of Joe When Joe dies, $2 million in his name, tax of $99,000

10

2/17 /2015

Case 2: Revocable trusts, Mary dies. Usually bypass trust within larger document 'Subtrust'

Bypass trust (aka 'credit shelter trust' aka 'Family Trust') 1. Income= to Joe

2. Principal= to Joe for his HEMS

3. Death of beneficiary = 4. Surviving spouse (SS) can be trustee IF a) Ascertainable standard for principal

5. NOT included in SS estate

MA Bypass Trust: Mary's first $1 million Irrevocable • Simple Income = ALL to beneficiary (usually SS) Principal = None for the YEAR actually distributed nor charitable • Complex All others • Can be simple one year, complex in another year

11

2/17 /2015

M706 MA estate tax return ------------------------- Schedule G ------------------------------"Decedent transferred assets to a trust that was revocable by him under IRC 2038. Copy of trust is attached. See listing of assets owned by the trust attached. Name of trust was "xxx, dated ". Trustees were hhh and www."

If Mary owned $1.4 million (of $2 million) • Marital trust for amount over $1 million Income = ALL income to SS Principal= Death of beneficiary = • Simple Trust for ANY year no corpus is distributed • Can change from year to year • OR can be outright to Joe

12

2/17 /2015

Post death Grantor trust? • Grantor Trust? Possibly Deceased? NO Beneficiary: MAYBE IRC 678 - Mallinckrodt trusts Beneficiary can withdraw principal IF GRANTOR TRUST then all Income, Credits and Deductions belong to beneficiary (671)

United states Estate {and Generation-Skipping

"" 706

BYPASS TRUST USED

lo!•IRe•-•S.r~oe

~ :t

to :is

11<

!

for

T<>i..!ll«l11M-""t>!W :M!6"'...,pago<<>t1,.._,..._11<>.,._

°'°"""'r•llO!-•Jl
1~'.'.i:~r.;.~'!.;:!""'"'.s..10("""'"'m""'""d

flb>no!.,..O•~l"''l<''olitw10>lnlW0""4 ·-1«----l"~f«<."1•~«...1'"""'*»

11>0•«f
Estimate Tax

.$1>"'r"""""""""""*'

~

7•

llomooo<>10<<"'1'lll«iU~We#Olo'"-"'

: 1 1 i

Till
3

$400,000

htaf<>0t00/tiwo"""'klio>l"'ffl+Unll«{_f'i<:<>_!notroot1ot1'1.

Run for_

i I .. ,!

Marital deduction limited to

Transfer) Tax Return

14,.me11ws1 t>,.,rnn«ltoltrwT..-ioy

~= :\:~~r=~=:.~:..

1

Tu;<~)IJ
"'1",l<>\2ffomlot 1)

""'d oimoh

a~oml!!~«>

will

0 ,~"'"""'

!l

on

ff P<:11
~--

, •

- ----

~ ~~6"~:::~l~~~~~~.~/i,":~~ru~t~~~~~~~:~r;:e'.i~~n;':,~~!Wit~...,.'+--=='* ~

$

73

AddllnWJ
~ :'ms:1:::.:~;;?,:; 1:;1;:·.•.".',":"'"'

4.•. :~<>·?o.

• ••••

r,,e~~'--r------;

~nter5%(..ll5),.;~nef1>.

.

J

""

Qtoos ost"1~1m: (w!'Are<:trITT• ~frw:no& ll) •• , , , . Ma>:lln.lm Unit'l•
1~

0

1s

o.

µ• +---""""""

roi;; 1"nl>ll'lO t0< ("11~ Ill\$ f, •n
·'' '"" " f "~ "" "

5-

I-'+---'""""

1-"+---"""""-

Atiju.lmati! 1~ "'1~1"" «11<111 r~m:1;c~I:(• crwm MlOtlffl/.1111l!I

ooiuwnootrn01· no! e~oec~ ~.ooa. S•t W9~ 4
11

A!;:rmime W1!1h!Q ;rM~ (3ppiica!>fZ CT«ltt lmounl) (rnl*'o'1 ~"" tzr"'m line 11) •• $
•or

Cr&ii ilt~ (t1ffi ln;JruoijOOo) .......... ,,_ ••• ,................... C«~l«f«O\">li,1\~<:r'l:t~W?f~(~ZQl11\
S
1~

"%

13

2/17 /2015

When Joe later dies ... His gross estate does not include the Credit Shelter Trust of $1 Million that Mary established His MA estate tax is lower, or eliminated.

1041 return 1041

Bypass trust Marital trust Assume neither is 678 trust; not Grantor Trust BUT read the trust OR get 'Trust Income Tax Summary' from attorney PE:' $300 Simple Trust, $100,000 Complex Trust' BUT amount depends on whether income is mandatory

14

2/17/2015

Reading the trust Plain English Red book

Grantor trust? IRC 671-678 Very detailed 'Even experienced re-review the sections'

IRC 676: Revocable IRC 674: General rule of 'grantor trust status' with pages of exceptions • Inadvertent • Advertent: lower income tax brackets

15

2/17/2015

Advertent Trust includes power to make it a grantor trust for INCOME tax purposes Specific power not ESTATE tax includable E.g. Power to substitute equal value property 'Intentionally defective grantor trust'

...

My·Tnrntee·nui.y·use1rust·incon1trfbr·the-payn1ent'Dfpremiun1s ·on ·policies ·of·l1munmce·on · my·lifo-01·that·of111y-Spouse.·ln·addition,·~·may-reacquire·trust·assets·by-substituting· assets·of·equlvalent'Value.~

16

2/17/2015

Usually grantor trust design Exception: Clients from France Income tax concern Difficult to avoid grantor trust if parent is a trustee Can be done - narrow powers of trustee

Grantor trust treatment based on: $5,000 or 5% power • IRS: waiver of this right leads to beneficiary contributing to trust • Over the years, beneficiary has become part 'grantor owner' of trust under IRC 678 • Little noticed complication

17

2/17 /2015

Portion of trust is 'grantor trust' Trust terms can limit grantor trust treatment to either income or principal or both

Medicaid Expenses can be very high No will or trust: Not use Living Trust because house become countable • Mary dies. TT for Joe. TT assets not countable if he applies for Medicaid. • Not help if Mary not die. So, gifting. But Mary and Joe need $ to live on. Irrevocable income only trust: What is income?

18

2/17/2015

Medicaid - If have living trust Past clients: "Want to avoid probate." • Difficult to wean from living trust • Moral Qualms re: Medicaid Planning • Trust clients have more than average $ • Compare probate vs. month in nursing home • Compare $15,000 vs. $10,000 for one month

Part 2: Gifting in MA [M706 uses 706 (July 1999 version)]

• •

LINE 1: $1.4 Million - $500,000 Gift= $900,000 =ESTATE MA Tax calculated on line 3 amount Line 3 =Line 1 - Line 2 Deductions - $60,000 (Adjusted taxable estate)



Tax on $900,000 instead of $1.4 Million



GIFTS appear on line 4 Assume no MA estate tax but wrong Must file M706 because of ESTATE+ GIFTS (MA DOR) If file M706, then MA estate tax from 0 through $900,000 MA $1 Million exemption irrelevant to the tax calculation

• • •

19

2/17 /2015

M706 example of MA tax on $900,000 after GIFT

Gift lowers not eliminate MA estate tax Part 1. Tentative Massachu-setts Estate Tax 1 Tot8! gross estate, Entei'the affiounttrom- lheJu!y-1999 reWSlon of U-0~ form 706, page 1, !lne 1 .• , •. , • , • • • ,.1 j 900,0QQ, 2 Credit for state death taxes. Enter the amount from the July 1999-revfslon Cf U.S. Form 706, page 1, Hne 15. If this retum ls for the estate ofa

J

Massachusetts reslctenr decedent who did not own real estate andlot tangible persOl'lal property in another state, omit Parts 2.and $and enterthis amount In Part 4, Une 1. !fthls return fs for the estate-of a M~$achusetts resident (,fecedentwho owned real estate andfortar1glb!e personal property Jn other states, complete Parts 2 and 4 and omlt Part 3, If tills return is for the estate of a nonresident deCedent with Mas:?achuSetts property, omlt Part 2an9 complete Pii~ 3 and 4 , , • , , •• , •• , • , , .•. , •• .. 2 27,600,

!

I

20

2/17 /2015

"" 706

July

1~

I1o__:iooe.-
J•

~::i~:~-·~•><<>l•lot""'~nf0..0<1ml\l•<"'"1'/l I

i

1Jo

~o"'M!01"<0W(..,,!"P-4 ofin
Ito

-

7w

n."'~IOM"'.'®onot~w...-...i1,,,.~~"01or-«!ln
I

U.S. Estate tax return

ll«m.1'~1;.i,,.,,,~OM:mll'l"'i
j

~

1999

United·States.Estate (~nd
i ~

..

t !i

I

ru-1o<1,11Sm.-

D
i-;:;;:;,--(Oo0\t«'1•"4.trm~"""*'9•WJl'>.,l«>Ulo8"'0<"""3

-°""~l"...... (1¢>l!'ll'"'flo~-}

(OW!,(J(;r
\toe"'""""""

.

rrOO°"!fe1'1\iRndl~al~ d1.,.kh0!
-.

)

A.l(iw-led lm;•tl~ ll1Hs ««al t:at.;ita (II~ ("'11/'!n i1le moonmv (.1 •t.:11_onreo:t) rnalii llf lM t f!r~1, 1~75-. ~iMr.tllM!)lrtst11atar& ~•In """'"'""t"'"'-'•H"""~Tu~1$j} P.+-~'.,, "00;m00~0y' 2,~~~·'.:'::~·

:r A1m 7

µ+---""'l!l

>

Missing Gift Tax Returns • Many GTR not filed • California experience • Why? Inadvertent Advertent but mistaken Not needed because of trust or deed terms

Incomplete gift Dominion and Control (D & C) Lost in shuffie

Ill spouse gifts Yz to well spouse, not a citizen Statute of limitations - none if no 709

21

2/17/2015

Continue to live in the house after gift IRC 2036 - Part of estate Step up in basis Why the gift? Govt. benefits Pay expenses instead of parent Fear of son-in-law

If want outside of estate, parent pay fair market rental

Part 3. Trust Reporting FAQs on Grantor Trust Tax Reporting Read addendum article

22

2/17 /2015

FAQl. Who is the grantor? Person putting $ in

FAQ 2: What are the methods for income tax reporting? • Traditional • Alternative 1 • Alternative 2

23

2/17 /2015

FAQ3: When is a grantor trust required to get a taxpayer identification number?

FAQ 4: May any grantor trust report its income under one of the ''alternative methods''?

24

2/17/2015

.

FAQ 5: May the trustee change a trust's reporting method?

FAQ 6: Are there special considerations when a husband and wife are both settlors of a trust?

25

2/17 /2015

FAQ 7: Do special rules apply if non-U.S. persons, trusts, or assets are involved?

FAQ 8: What happens when the owner dies or the trust otherwise ceases to be a grantor trust?

26

2/17/2015

FAQ 9: Are there special considerations for an irrevocable life insurance trust?

FAQ IO: Are there special considerations for term and splitinterest trusts?

27

2/17/2015

Part 4. Responsible party on SS4 lt!RS Responsible Parties and Ndmlnees Rl<$pontlb!t

P~ril1's

Alf 8N ai:r;li0<1IOrm. i1n>il. iox, •i«lt~IO !'rlI ll"'tci-ltlwllifkotlot1 Nurn~ (3$N. ITIN, "''EIN) of 1~e ~"" p;ir~i!)lll oflio.,,g.,.,,zy 1'"'1oor, iJ<•IMr, o•·t
moll6"'liiot>IS•ll· mp!oy6
i:r;.,ildl•ief 11•<.lRS ""~foll 1!\e ™l"'"'l!ila poll;>.' •""1•oi:i,

lfl~"IJl:l\
owiw

•=IP'. or~:r<>
Md!O<>.J1:8[rnllicr>oi,lt• 1Wlt/!>arci"'%b. lf~ior..fu mt'llf/ !hf .,,lit/~ 1h• !RSfo "'iu! :i.. lh~ '""P"'"'ibl•

j>lrti

MoOfdlrw to Ille 1....trw1iom for lbf«imm! r
awl""""'" irn. "M:>Cl'fii~le psrt( i1

nmnen.iuot.WS•ll· !l)fl!o~lo~

Is the Grantor the 'responsible party'?

28

2/17 /2015

Part 5: Trust Questionnaire Irrevocable trust - EA told 'defective trust' - no gift tax return filed - primary and vacation home 2. Dad puts $400,000 into irrevocable trust, buys condo, Dad lives there - no GTR for $400,000 3. ILIT, got EIN, IRS looking for 1041 4. House into irrevocable trust, sold, client asks if EIN for trust or use mother's SSN - was GTR filed? 1.

Themes: • GTR needed? • Gift completed or not? • Grantor trust or not? Incomplete gift: in granting document (deed or trust) grantor keeps power to designate owner of property during grantor lifetime or in their will

29

2/17 /2015

Trust inside PDA: Year 1,2 or year 18? Like elephant, depends on which part you're handling Post Death Administration (PDA) is unlike year 18 Year 18: Stocks and bonds Year 1: Many types of assets, ownership, issues, decisions (Joint, sole, trust, beneficiary) I

Death

30

2/17 /2015

Role of law in taxation issues Real estate often involved Example: Sale of vacation home at a loss. Can PR carryout the loss to the beneficiaries when probate concludes? Capital loss? Or hard cheese?

-1

°'

&ff 11>1 ~ illM' 111 IJ 1M I. d II ~ llllli-

~ Ill

&!!li»sld!M~~~_.itill ~ of lidm!nllllm!I011, h a tr.imait <11~«1-~0lll'lllwh~ld& or Ui!al h IO!mw ~- Fol'~' II,

h

Publication 559 (2013), Survivors, Executors, and Administrators

•IM~~' Y®·illll!lld l:o!!!d$ !M~m!Mll
~lt--~11~ ~ sld did l'dl'M l!O!it it,'-

- , h 11vtlll1111W -

a

m~l'Maoo

~Ill' In·

II« I

m

Ill

~ ~~~~&~tohbooi!lll:!My

In}, sld YOll

to ~ will1lllit l1ml amwtiing It - bll$l!!M$ llil' ~l!lllltmt - , llllV pin !ii:~ bill a Ill'

IOllllllll'd~,

31

2/17 /2015

Will/trust law complicates the issue Example: If will devisees real estate to particular person: • Personal representative a 'stranger to the title' • Does the Pub 559 section apply?

Need to read the documents More than with corporation and other entities One of hardest parts of the job

32

2/17 /2015

Thank you

33

§9.9.14

Loring and Rounds: A Trustee's Handbook

good title to a BFP. 292 "Bailments must concern personal property only, but. trusts may affect either realty or personalty." 293 There are differences related to procedure as well: The remedies against ai recalcitrant bailee are generally legal, unless the subject property is unique, ·, while those against a recalcitrant trustee are generally equitable. 294 Unless the; bailment is coupled with an agency or trust, it is not a fiduciary relationship. 295 •; "Although a few cases outside of the United States treat bailments as fiduciaty.!t relationships, that characterization has not been adopted by U.S. Courts." 296 )

§9.9.14 The Administrative Trust (U.S.) The terms of the typical revocable inter vivas trust provide that upon the death of the settlor the trust shall divide or fracture into two or more separate sub-trusts, 297 or terminate altogether, with the remaindermen taking outright • and free of trust shares of the underlying trust property. As we have noted elsewhere in this handbook, for trust and property. law purposes, these sub- · tnists or shan;s are deemed to be funded as of the time when the settlor dies. 298 • "Equity looks on that as done which ought to be done." 299 The typical revocable inter vivos trust, however, is seldom more than token-funded or partially funded while the settlor is alive. 300 The trustee can · expect that the lion's share of the physical funding will take place well after the . settlor' s death and will take the form of pour-overs from the settlor' s probate · estate, proceeds from insurance on the settlor's life, 301 distributions from. employee benefit plans,3°2 and the like. 303 In other words, it will not be until · many months after the settlor' s death that all assets due the trust are marshaled and valued and there is a full physical funding of the sub-trusts or outright distribution of the remainder shares, as the case may be.

292

Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 1 I. Bogert, Trusts and Trustees § 11. 294 See Bogert, Trusts and 'Ilustees § 11; §7.2 .3 of this handbook (types of equitable reli.effor breaches of trust). 295 I Scott &A.scher §2.3.1; Bogert, Trusts and Trustees §11. 296 D. Gordon Smith, The Critical Resource Theory of Fiduciary Dury, 55 Vand. L. Rev. 1399, n.61 (2002). See also Bogert, Trusts and Trustees §11. 297 See generally §8.9 of this handbook (why more than one trust: the estate and generationskipping tax). See also §3.5.3.2(d) of this handbook (an express power in the trustee to combine the property of multiple sub-trusts in a common fund for invesnnent purposeS). 298 See generally §§6.2.4.5 of this handbook (when a beneficiary's entitlement to income 293

begins) and 8.2.3 of this handbook (trust termination and distribution issues). 299 See §8.12 of this handbook (containing a catalogue of critical equity maxims). soo See generally §2.1.1 of this handbook (token-funding, partially funding and fully funding revocable intervivos trusts). See also §2.2.1 of this handbook (the pour-over statute). 301 See generally §2.2 .2 of this handbook (life insurance beneficiary designations). 302 See generally §9,5 of this handbook (trusts for deferring taxation of income). 303 See, e.g., §2.2.3 of this handbook (the custodial IRA).

1488

Special 'I)'pes of Trusts

§9.9.14

This delay poses some practical problems for the trustee, particularly if it extends beyond twelve months or straddles more than one income tax reporting year. 304 As of the time of the settlor's death, the beneficiaries of the sub-trusts or the remaindermen will have received equitable property rights, either vested or contingent, or both. 305 Also, the items of property that ultimately find their way into the hands of the trustee of the sub-trusts or the remaindermen are likely to have been throwing off taxable income since the time when the settlor died. Taxes are likely to be owed on that income. 306 In . other words, the trustee during this asset-marshaling limbo period needs to '. keep track of and protect the equitable property rights of the beneficiaries of ' the phantom sub-trusts or the remaindermen, 307 as well as see to it that · whatever income taxes are owed with respect to the property items are paid. Also, obligations for debts and expenses attributable to the phantom sub-trusts or undistributed remainder shares need to be properly allocated. 308 During this limbo period, i.e., during the period from the time wheri the settlor dies to the time when all the sub-trusts are fully funded or the remainder shares are distributed, the trustee may want to administer the property that was in the revocable intervivos trust as ifitwere the subject ofwhat has been referred to as an "administrative trust." The reserved right of revocation having extinguished with the death of the settlor, the "administrative trust" would need its own separate tax identification number. 309 The trustee also would need to file with the IRS a separate Form 56. 310 Still, as a matter of trust and property law, the administrative trust would be more a probate estate analog than a true trust:· At the outset, the attorney should understand that there is a common misconception that professional services are unnecessary in the administration of 304 See generally John A Hartog & George R. Dirkes, Assisting the Nonprofessional Trustee in Implementing the Administrative Trust (visited Aug. 13, 2008)
materials-I .html>. 305 See generally §6.2.4.5 of this handbook (when a beneficiary's entitlement to trust accounting income begins) and §8.2.3 of this handbook (when the trustee, for whatever reason, fails, in contravention of the terms of the trust, to effect the termination and division of a one-pot trost,.or unduly delays in doing so). 306 See generally John A. Hartog & George R. Dirkes, Assisting the Nonprofessional 'Ilustee in Implementing the Administrative Dust (visited Aug. 13, 2008) , 307 See generally §6.2.4.5 of this handbook (when a beneficiary's entitlement to trust accounting income begins). · 308 See generally §6.2.4.4 of this handbook. 309 See generally John A. Hartog & George R. Dirkes, Assisting the Nonprofessional 1tustee in Implementing the Administrative 1tust (visited Aug. 13, 2008) . See also §8.34 of this handbook (when an employer identification number (EIN) is not required). . 310 Notice Concerning Fiduciary Relationship. See generally John A. Hartog-& George R. Dirk.es, Assisting the Nonprofessional 'hustee in Implementing the Administrative Tiust (visited Aug.13, 2008) (noting also that a "successor trustee should attach to the Form 56 an Affidavit of Successor Tiustee 1 declaring that the successor is the duly constitute successor trustee"). See generally §3.4.2 of this handbook (acceptance of trusteeship). 1489

§9.9.15

Loring and Rounds: A Trustee's Handbook

living trusts after death. In fact, even though most successor trustees do not know it, probate and trust administration require the same three administrative functions: (1) Making an inventory of assets; (2) Paying debts and taxes; and (3) Distributing the remaining assets to the designated beneficiaries. 311 For a general discussion of the mechanics of implementing an administrative trust, the reader is referred to an article hy two practitioners, John A. ·Hartog and George R. Dirkes. 312 For an in-depth detailed step-by-step explanation of the procedures that the trustee should follow in establishing, admin~. istering, and terminating an administrative trust, the reader is referred tq California Tiust Administration. 313 Two chapters therein contain numerous.,: forms and checklists. .:: Joel Bernstein, Esq., a Massachusetts-based trusts and estates practitioner,J has modified his trust administration software to accommodate the idiosyncra~\! sies of the administrative trust. 314 !,1 For a discussion of how the trustee of a revocable trust could find hims · functioning as an "inadvertent executor," the reader is referred to Section 8. · of this handbook.

§9.9.15

The Civil Law Foundation ls Not a .Trust

The private civil law foundation, unlike the trust, is a creature of statute. Also, unlike the trust, the civil law foundation is a separate juristic entity or le' person.3 16 It resembles a corporation, only without shareholders, in that entity itself owns the managed assets. A noncharitable civil law foundation · have individual beneficiaries, although it is a principle of foundation law. the members of the foundation's board or council owe their primary allegi to the entity itselfrather than to the beneficiaries.3 17 This is a critical differ between the civil law noncharitable foundation and the noncharitable tru"' A discretionary permissible beneficiary of a Civil law foundation h " enforceable legal or quasi-equitable property right.~ in foundation ass

311

2 California Trust Administration §13.1 (2d ed. 2002). . . ·-" Assisting the Nonprofessional Trustee in Implementing the Administrative TiUSt'_ Aug. 13, 2008) . .§ 313 2 California Trust Administration Chs. 13, 14 (2d ed. 2002). ' 314 See jbernsteinlaw.com. Mr. Bernstein may be reached atjoelbernsteinlO@g 315 Unlike a statutory civil law noncharitable foundation, a trust may change its si having to be dissolved and reconstituted, the trustee being the legal "owner" of property. · · 312

316

The trust is a legal relationship between the trustee and the beneficiaries . · 317 A civil law private noncharitable foundation also may exist to carry out a no purpose, such as the furtherance of a family business. 318 See generally §6.1.3 of this handbook (the trustee's duty ofloyalty to the be 319 See generally §5.3.1 of this handbook (the trust beneficiary's property inte entity.

1490

I ~1~ ~w (c~

.,

(j)

m. Consider Need to Coordinate with Insurance Trust for Payment ofDeath Taxes. Ifthe decedent established an irrevocable life insurance trust to provide for payment of death taxes, determine how to access the cash in that trust. Trustee of insurance trust cannot pay death taxes directly because that would.result in inclusion of the proceeds in the decedent's estate. IRC § 2042; Treas. Reg. § 20.Z042~i(b)El,),. Trustee of revocable trust must either sell assets to the irrevocable trust or borrow from the irrevo'fubJ~. trust . ;,,.,~.,

. 18. Discuss Income Tax

Is.~ues,, ·

a. Allocate Responsibility for Decedent's Personal Returns and- Fiduciary Returns . .Determine who will prepare and file decedent's final personal income tax returns and the trust's fiduciary income tax returns. Ifprobate is required because the trust was not fully funded, there may also be separate fiduciary returns required for the probate estate. Consider need to refer client to CPA. b. Determine What Returns Need to be Filed, Det'etmine if previous years' · personal returns were filed as required. Determine if any income tax returns are required in states other than state of decedent's domicile (for example, income-producing real property located in . another state). Calculate period for final (short year) personalp':turns (January 1 through date of death) and the first short year return for the trust (date of dea)!i through December 31). Determine if trust fiduciary retilrns for the trust must be filed if the tru6t' has any taxable income [income in excess of the exemption amount (see!. below)] and gross i~bme in excess of$600, whether 9r not there is taxable income. IRC § 6012(a). Reg. § 1.6012~3:,' /l/ . c. Explain Basis Step-Up. The income tax basis of assets in the trust (or outside the trust, for that matter) which are includable in the decedent's gross estate, other than items which constitu.te income in respect of a decedent ("IRD"), will be increased or decreased to the value determined for federal estate tax purposes (date of death or alternate v.aluation date). I.RC. §I 014. d. Determine Whether to Use Administrative Trust. From the death of the trustor until the date of distribution to beneficiaries, should we use a separate taxpayer administrative trust? The question has been a matter of some debate among tax professionals. · Of course, if the trust instrument includes an administrative trust provision which deals with this issue, one should follow the instnunent. (See Exhibit 4, page 2) However, in our experience, virtually all trust instruments are silent concerning post-mortem administration. For those trusts which are silent, there are two camps: those who follow the "pass-through" approach and those who follow the "administrative trust" approach.

(I) Pass-Through Approach. Some tax professionals suggest that the revocable trust ceases to exist at the death of trustor and that it should be ignored for income tax purposes. Under this approach, all income is taxed to the beneficiaries, commencing with the date of death, even though the trust estate has not been physically distributed. (2) Administrative Trust Approach. Other tax professionals suggest that the joint revocable trust functions like a probate estate and that the revocable trust, i.e., as an "administrative trust," should be treated as a separate taxpayer during the period between the date of death and the date of distribution (3) Service's Position. There appears to be no stated position by the Service. (But see Rev. Rul. 73-97, 1973-1 C.B. 404): Many those in the pass-through camp justify their position by stating that they know of no adverse response from the Service. However, this may 24--GAW

1. Discuss··Income Tax Brackets for Trusts. For 2008, the marginal income tax rates for trusts are as follows:

2008

~~

If Taxable Income Is:

The Tax is:

Not over $2,200

15% of the taxable income

Over $2,200 but not over $5,150

· $330 plus 25% of the excess over $2,200

Over $5,150 but not over $7 ,850

$1,067.50 plus 28% of the excess over $5,150

Over $7,850 but not over $10, 700

$1,823.50 plus 33% of the excess over $7 ,850

Over $10,700

$2,764 plus 35% of the excess over $10,700

i

j. Consider Timing of Distributions (65-Day Rule). Consider whether to make distributions of income to lower bracket beneficiaries during the administrative trust period rather · than accumulating income and paying tax at trust level. Distributions within first 65 days of the trust's tax year may be treated as made on December 31 of the prior year if an election is made on . the trust's fiduciary return. I.R.C. §663(b) (Note: the 1997 Tax Act applied this rule to probates also.). Also consider effect of disptoportionate preliminary distributions on allocation ofDNI among 1 /efeneficiaries and income tax effects to the beneficiaries. California is now in accordance with this I . · rule. Rev. & Tax. Code § 17~ff·

I. Personal Exemption. A trust has a personal exemption of$ I 00 unless income is required to be distributed currently (i.e., a "simple trust"), in which case it has a personal exemption of $300. (Compare to probate estate, which has a personal exemption of $600.) m. Quarterly Estimates for Trust. As a general rule, trusts are required to file quarterly estimates. I.R.C. § 6654(k). However, ifthe trust in question is an administrative trust operating in lieu of a probate estate, and the grantor's will provides for residue to be poured over to the trust, the trust qualifies for a two-year exemption from quarterly estimates. I.RC:" § 6654(1 )(2)(B). n. Suh-Chapter S. A revocable living trust will continue to qualify as an S corporation shareholder following the settlor's death for up to two years, provided that the entire trust corpus is includable in the gross estate of the settlor; otherwise, under the old law, it would qualify for only 60 days. I.RC.§ 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii). Under the tax provisions of the Small Business.Job Protection Bill of 1996, the grace period was extended for all trusts to two years.

Copyright 2007 .

GAW-27

. o. Passive Loss Deduction. The special rule ofI.R.C. § 469(!) for deduction of losses from rental property activity apply to estates for two years, but not to trusts. Therefore, such losses will not be available to the administrative trust. p. Income Tax Consequences of Funding Bequests.. (1) Non-Pro Rata Distributions From Trust. Non-pro rata distributions of trust assets may create a taxable event for income tax purposes. The position of the Service is that a non-pro rata distribution ofassets results in a taxable sale or exchange between beneficiaries unless the trustee has authority (either under the trust instrument or state law) to make a non-pro rata distribution of assets in kind. (Rev. Ru!. 69-486, I 969-2 C.B. I 59; see PLR 81I9040.) In California, ifthe trust instrument is silent, Prob. Code §16246 provides the necessary authority for the trustee to allocate assets non-pro rata. (2) Types of Bequests and Tax Consequences. The tax consequences of testamentary gifts will vary depending on whether they are specific, pecuniary(including a formula), fractional, or residuary. (a) Specific Gifts. The funding of a specific gift is not a taxable event.

11

/

/I

Example. Decedent dies on March I with a living trust. The trust estate is comprised of 10 shares ofXYZ Corp stock worth $90 per share on the date of death, but worth $100 per share on May 1, when the trust is distributed. The income tax basis of the stock is $90 per share (date of death value). Decedent's trust provides: "I give to my niece, Nancy, 10 shares ofXYZ Corp stock and the balance of my trust estate in equal shares to my then living children." When the trustee distributes the I 0 shares of stock to Nancy, no one will recognize capital gain on the postdeath appreciation in that stock. Nancy holds the stock with a basis of$90 per share. However, the trustee may elect to tre~kthis transaction as taxable, thereby increasing the basis. IRC § 642(e)(3)(A)(ii). . !'!/ . . f 1 1j (b) Pecuniary Gift. The funding of a pecuniary bequest with ass~ts in kind using date of distribution values is a taxable event, causing realization of gain or loss equal to the difference between the date of death value and the date of distribution value. Treas; Reg. § 1.661 (a)-2(f)(l) and§ l.1014-4(a)(3); Rev. Ru!. 56-270, 1956-1 C.B. 325; Rev. Ru!. 60-87, 1960-1 C.B. 286; Kenan v. Comm'r, 114 F.2d 217 (2d Cir. 1940). In the event assets have appreciated in value, the gain will be recognized by the administrative trust or, if none, the successor beneficiaries. In the event the trust assets have depreciated in value, the administrative trust cannot recognize a loss upon funding the pecuniary formula bequest. I.R.C. § 267(a)(l), (b). Ifno administrative trust is employed, it is possible that the loss could be recognized by non-trust successor beneficiaries. It may 0 be possible to recognize the loss by selling the asset to a third party before distribution, and funding the pecuniary bequest with cash. Example. Same facts as above except decedent's trust provides: "I give to my niece, Nancy, $1000 and the balance of my trust estate to my then living children in equal shares." If the trustee satisfies Nancy's gift by distributing to her the 10 shares ofXYZ Corp stock worth $1000 on May I, the trustwill recognize $100 of capital gain, i.e., the difference between the $1000 FMV of the stock and the trust's income tax basis in the stock of$900. The capital gain will be reported by the trust if an administrative trust concept is applied, or by the children if the terminated trust approach is used. Nancy will hold the stock with a basis of $100 per share.

II B ii . I ••• •.. ii ~

.

.

;.:.·

,,

fr.·i.•·J!ll .•.' ·. ·. •

28--GAW

Copyright 2007

~

'',; ''

' ·.~ I I

1

.

(c) Fractional and Residuary Gifts. The funding of a fractional gift or residuary gift is not a taxable event. Treas. Reg.§§ 1.66I(a)-2(f), l.1014-4(a)(3). Example. Sarne as above, except decedent's trust provides: "I give to my niece, Nancy, one percent of my trust estate, and the balance to my then living childten in equal shares." The total trust estate is $100,000, so one percent is $1,000. If the trustee distributes the 10 shares ofXYZ stock to Nancy, no one will recognize capital gain. Nancy will hold the stock with a basis of $90 per share. · Notwithstanding the foregoing, the executor or trustee can make an· election under I.R.C. §643(e)(3) to treat distributions that would otherwise be non-taxable as taxable, i.e., "as if such property had been sold to the distributee at its fair market value." I.R.C. § 643 (e)(3)(A)(ii). The election is made on a year by year basis on the fiduciary return. This election applies to all distributions made during the year in which the election is in force. q. Discuss Trust Income During Administration Period. What happens to income earned on trust assets during the post-death administrative period? If the trust instrument is silent, consult the law of the applicable jurisdiction. (!) In California, Prob. Code §16304 provides that "an income beneficiary is entitled to income from the date specified in the trust instrument or, if none is specified, from the date an item of property becomes subject to the trust. In the case of an item of property becoming subject to a trust by reason of a person's death, it becomes subject to the trust as of the date of the death of the person even though there is an intervening period of administration of the persons estate, except that income on the property during the period of administration is governed by [Prob. Code §12000 et seq.], and becomes subject to the trust as it accrues." (Emphasis added.)

, ;I

,

·/ · (2) A sm¢Cific devise does not bear interest during the administration period. Prob. Code §12002(a). Howel'V'er, "a specific devise carries with it income on the devised property from the date of death, less expenses attributable to the devised property during administration of the estate." Prob. Code §!2002(b), 16340(a). (3) "If a general pecuniary devise, including a general pecuniary devise in trust, is not distributed within one year after the testator's death, the devise bears interest thereafter." Prob. Code §12003, l 6340(b). Such gifts pay interest starting one year after death at the rate of three percentage points below the legal rate. Probate Code§§ 12001and12002 (current is 7%; 10%minus 3%). (4) "Net income received during administration not paid under other provisions of Probate Code§§ 12000-12007 and not otherwise devised shall be distributed pro rata as income among all distributees who receive either residuary or intestate property." Prob. Code §12006. r. Either Assign Number. Obtain Number By Phone, or Have Client SignForm SS4 to Obtain TIN for Administrative Trust. If the decision is made to use an administrativ~ trust, obtain a separate TIN for the living trust during the period of post-death administration. In any event, TIN's will be required for any on-going successor trusts. In our office, we use blocks of numbers obtained from the Internal Revenue Service and assign a number at the first meeting. For Northern California, write to Internal Revenue Service, Entity Control Section, Mail Stop 6271, P.O. Box 9941, Ogden, UT 84201; for Central and Southern California, write to Internal Revenue Service, Entity Control Section, Fresno CA 93888. See IRS Pub 1635; Rev Proc 89-37, 1989-1 Cum Bull . Copyright 2007

GAW-29

'

-~

9'19. Once 'the required papenyork is filled out, numbers in groups ofl 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 (whichever is requested) will be mailed to you. Before obtaining the next block of numbers, a form must be faxed or mailed to the IRS showing which numbers have been assigned and the relevant information (e.g., trust name, settlor, trustee). Note: Since January 1, 2002, the IRS utilizes an East Coast service center for the purposes of filing Form SS-4 (Attn: TIN Operation, Philadelphia, PA 19255, Tele-TIN: 866-8162065, Fax-TIN: 215-516-3990). As an alternative to obtaining blocks of TIN' s, you can also fax in your completed . SS-4 to the IRS. Numbers will be mailed directly to the client, unless you also fax them a completed form 2848 (Power of Attorney), indicating that you wish the number to be faxed to your office. Also, you may obtain the TIN's over the Internet. 19. Discuss Real Property Tax Issues. a. Determine if "Change of Ownership" Occurs for Property Tax Purposes. In California, property may be reassessed any time there is a "change of ownership." When property is transferred to a revocable living trust, a change in ownership for property tax purposes does not occur until the death of the settlor. 18 Cal. Adm. Code§ 462(n)(4)(A). b. Determine Whether Parent-Child Exclusion Available. A reappraisal of real property in the trust will be required at the death of the settlor unless an exclusion applies, such as a parent-child transfer. Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 63. I. (!) Calculate and Allocate the Exclusion. The parent-child exclusion is Jl9'1Pted to the first $1 million of property value (assessed value, not fair market value), plus the · .ti:ustor's principal residence, whi1tli is.also exempt. "Principal residence" is defined in Cal. Rev. and ·Tax. Code §63 .1 (b)(1) to incluq,only the portion of!and underlying the principal residence which consists of an area of reasonabJfo size which is used as a site for the residence. Therefore, a farm or ranch may not qualify under ~e principal residence exemption and may require the application of some or all of the $1 million' exemption. .

(2) Application to On-Going Trusts. The parent-child exclusion will apply in the case of an outright distribution to children or in the case of continuing trusts, provided the children are the sole present beneficiaries of the trust or trusts. 18 Cal. Adm. Code § 462(I)(2)(A). If the trust is a sprinkling trust in which the trustee has authority to make income distributions to decedent's children and grandchildren, the quoted regulation states that the property is subject to a change in ownership, but many local assessors take the position that there would be a change in ownership only to the extent that the trustee actually makes distributions to grandchildren. (3) Determine Time for Filing Parent-Child Exclusion Application. Section 63.1 was amended to provide that, for transfers made after November 6, 1986, a parent-child claim · is timely if filed within six months after the mailing of the notice of supplemental or .escape assessment. c. Determine Whether Grandparent- Grandchild Exclusion is Available. Note that · the grandparent/grandchild exclusion only applies ifthe grandchild's parent is deceased. 20. Discuss Trustee Compensation and Time Records. The trust instrument may provide a method of determining trustee compensation. If the instrument is silent, a trustee is entitled to 30--GAW

Copyright 2007

Frequently Asked Queetlona on Grantor Trust Tax Rep:ort,lng Pl'lietlcal answers IJelp ·With common situations lhvolvlng 11le federal tncome·tax reporting requirements associated with gran~r trusts.

.T·

·1vANTAl>ACKANbStb'ITA. BOWMllN,ATYORNB'S

· · · ·671through679 .he· .b· · · ~. ic p.r..e·in·J·s·e·(the .&· .· ·"grautor .·~. ct.lo.ns $·

misri;ules") is·sltnple enough: Where·one or inot.e of.these sectioP:s ;i;ppLy;tlie'grahtQr·of a trust (or,.irdhe case of S'<)ction 678, the beneficiary crfa trust•) isrequired to inc'lude the trust.'s items of income, dedl1¢tlou, and crWit crn the granto;'s petsonal ln¢ome tax r¢tutn, ·Sl!Ch '!- trµst ls cPJ:i1m<;inly

t¢fe~-t(!~f tq ·~~:

a: -:''-gr~~t¢>:r ·trust_._~ NotwJ:thstandlng ihe simplicity of the geh~ral liule, tl\e prop¢rrepoi:tc fog,.oftheseitems.bytlie.tr11st¢¢·and the grantor~b«subject to a complex set of rules.

Tax i'elll!rtlnu i'il!et This artkk provides practieal an~wets

to swne of the more frequently !lskedquesti<>ns (FAQs) that atis'°' wi.th teg~itd to the fode,al incoru.etax reporting req:ui!ements

ass
"gtantor'' hasthe.mel!l'!ingghre!lto it under Reg. L67"-2\e)1 as further e¥plahted below; a1id the retm

"owner" means tliepersonwhoi$ required to fodude the trust's items ofincome, deduction, aud credit on such person's personal income .taJ\'. return. The discussion below assumes thatthe professional adVis· ing the owner has already deter· mined that the trust is a grantoi: tlitisl for income. t>lltp\.I~poses .

FAQL Who fs t#e gra>ttort Except in the case of agrantor trust tinder Section. 678 ,> identifying the grantor of a. trnst is essential to determine the proper owner oftl\e tt.ust,~~ it~.m·s ·of Jn.con1e, 'c{edt;tf:tion, and credit under the grantor· trust rules. tdsa question.that arises fre• queutly,. .a.nd .the answer is :no.t

always slmp)e; IVANTAilACk'ls apilitnidn the iilewYo'tk Cl\1 dfflc~ ri(Pr6Sk!IU$f• R6Se !,LP. SC0Tf A. OOWMAN'is: M SMocfate lh !fie Boca.Raton, Florida, office of Proskauei. Rose UP.

34

lllil

As a general rule, the te·rm ''gralitor" inoludes any person ro the e;'i:teriJ sJ1ch person either ere• ates a trust, or directly odndirecHy im\k¢sa gratuitous traJ1i;fn who creates a trust but lilakes;no gr~tuiM\lstrausfor to .the trust ls not tt¢ated as an oW1>1'.r ofi a#y J?6ftfori oHhe trust for purpo~e~ ofapplying the grantor trust rules. Similarly, a person who funds a trust with an amouur that is directly relmbur$ed to such person Within a reasonable period and who makes no other transfers to tl\e tr\lst that are gra· tuitous transfers•is uot treated as an owner of any J5.ortion ofthetrust under the gratitot trust rules>' F:hr ·these.ptitp-os·e_s~ a: s-tatuitol.iS ttansfet~s ~l!Y tril\l.sfor ¢ther than a tra\lsfe:r :for ·fair·.market value. A ttansf"t of property to a.trust may be. sonsidered a gratuitous

a

transfer regardless of whether thee transfer is treate4 as a. gifrfor gltt .tax purpose~.< The following are some common

scenarios where one might take pause in determining the. granror of a trust: • When .a trustee of a tmst makes a g:ratuito:us tr!ln~fer of pr()percy to anothe!'.'rrust (Le., a distribution in further trµst or a trilst <:leeantlµg}, the grantor of the rr•nsferor trust is treate4 as ):he giantor of the transferee trust. The trustee is not treated as the grantor. • When the holder of a general power of appointment: over the transferor trust exercise.s that power in favor of another trust, the power holder ls tt.e"1te4 as the grantor of the tr~nsfere.e tl'.1.ist, even if the grantor of the transferor trust is treated as the owner of the transferor trust under the grantor trust rules. • W:hen.recipr()cal trusts·f\re created,. a settler may be techarac:rerized .as the granter of the trust that hem she did no_t cre.ate._s • When married individuals are the joint sertlor.s ofa trust, determining the granror is a function ofsubstantlve local law, For example, in a comm11niiy property state, both iudlvidu!)ls ate cypically considere.d grantors of the 1

Sf;loHon 678 provides a spi::tOl~l·ruJe wh_ere a· be.rtef!cia,ry· of ~- t11.1st may be tr~irteQ . as. the own.er when such Qenefitjary:hq!cJl? _µ _pqwer:

to 1t1lt_hd_rayV':the Jncom_e:or.co~[jS cif.tha:-trust,

or ·wtJere· $l!9h ·a pow$r ·flas·prevto.u$!y been

.re!eeised, a See $Upt$ note 1. 'Reg.1.S71·2(e)(1), • Reg. 1.671·2(e)(2),

a See Krause, 497 F.2<11109, 34AFTR2d 74-

5044. (CA·a, 1974), • See Sections 6012(aX4) and (5). 1 Reg. 1.671-4'(a}. 6 Reg ..1.67H(b)(2)\l)(A); ' Re~. M7H(b)(4~ AUOVS_T 2012

VO!,, &9- f . .NO f$

trust. In a.cpmmon law state, both !n~iyid11als are considered granfors pfthe trust only if the ti'ust is fund· ed from a joi.nt acµount. If. the trustis fonded from one spo,,.se's ~eparate .aqcpuJ1t, that spouse is the grantor; ev.en if the otliet spous~ agrees to ~gift•split" for gift ta,:><; pµi:pose.s.

FAQ 2. What are the methods for income tax re-porting? Grautor trusts are aubjecr ro. the same· basic reporting reqiiirements as other trusts; that is, reporting is required onlyif the trust has gross income: exceeding $600, tax.abk income, ~nd.a beneficiary who is a nonresident al\en.e lfthe trustee is requjred toreport,.then the tnisree maytypkally select from the. t~a­ diti<:>nal re_porting method and rwo alternative reportinll methods. Traditional .method. Under the traditional method, the !terns of income, 4eduetlon, an4 credit att;ibµpble to any portion of a trnst that is treated as owned by the granter under the grantortrust rules are n<1treportcd on the trust's Form 1041. Notwlthstan.diug the fact that the trust must obtain a ta>Cpayer identification number and is ohliged to file an income tax return, the trust does not include on its return the items of income, deduction., aud credit attributable to the grantor; Rather, the trus.tee shows these items on a separate

foi:m attache.d t<1 theJ?otm 104.1 ang Jderitifi¢sthe granter (. ticaditionalmethod. First altefnative f!iethod. Onder the first alternathe method, the trustee must i;>rovide to 4)1 "payors" during the tax year. the.name and taxpayer i<:\enrificaJfou nurn, bet of the grantor an<:! th.e addres.s of the trust,• A "payor" means any person. who .is reqnlred by the Code or Regulations to make.any type of information return with respeFtt!) the trustfor the tax year..• Unless the owner fa also the trustee br CO·ttustee of the tr11st, ihe mwtee tnust furnish ihe owner with a state' m¢nt that do~s the £ol.1o'Ning: • Shows alUtems of income, ,leduqiqµ, apd cre\.lit of r]Je trust for the tax yea<. • Identifies the .pay.or ofeach it¢_m,·of income-. • :Provides the owner with the iniormatid is permitG'RANTOR IA\JST.S'

ted only where th.ere .ls a single ow:n(}r ofthe trllst. Xt ls the most Gol!U:tl® meth<;nf ofreporilngfor a. teVOGih!ettl)~t. Secon.d alternative method.

Un.ifor ·ehe second ilteinative

method, !hJ>'tri:l*~cil 1111.U>.\ provide t.o all. par.ots
The \:Pll~t~¢theu ha~. the qb1\gatlojj to.

fife:.wJ.th.the IRS apptopr'late

Forms 1Will\reportin~ the income ot grbss pti>teeds pMd to thiur\lst
.trustee. IS notreqtilred to.file.a l'otm 1099 wheie.ahot'het fot11l. is used .tb repbtl!appfo.J.ltlately themcome,

such.as a Form K~ L•fThe trustee ·must also provide· a.csununaty and transmittal .oflnforil!atfonal returns hy filing l'or.!'.\l 1()9.(i, Unless .the own~r h al;sq t:li:e trustee.·ot cotrµStee, ..the trustee milM.furniSh the ow.net \cvith a sfatemen.tlhat: • .Shows a.l!Jiems of income; .de yea~. • Identifies the payor ofeach item of\ncome.

• l>ro\iides:;heownerwith the in£9J;tnatfon necessary t
fonhettust. Whbnilttusteeteports usfog.tf!e·fltst.al~ei;nativemethod,.

a separate talt I<:!e:ntificafloh mlmhe;foi:tl!etr1,1st)sno1required, as the owuer't taxpayet.identilication nt1mher is .11sedinstea<:!,Jfowever, when a tru.$1: that is ~eported on the firm iltern1'!tive methoc! e9ase~ fo be agr'antbrtbist or no longer reports using tlte ..Brst altettiatlve method, ihe trustee niust obtain a ta;cpayer i4entifi.cationnnmo·er for the trust.

If the trustee has plt'eviously tiled a Form 1041 under the traditional method, the trustee may change to one of the alternative methods by tiling a final Form 1041 for

the tax; year.

·

traditional m.ethod is treate"d as owned by th tee pehiol)S l!lld one of therµ (!Jes, the tr\lst, including the portion o£the ttttSt no longer tteat-

lldw l)wned under tfiegta!ltor trUSl'. rules; continues to report under the ti!x identification number Msigued to the trust ptlor to.the death of that persou.l!

FAQ 4.- May
owned·bya.single·t>Whet·Wh9 is J)()t ~ U..s, p_rtl ~s ·n{)t a U& person.

!firSingle owner ofa tiust dies, the trustee ls required to obiaru a Some Je.ss comrnontrusts that must riew·fa:x;payer ldentlfieatiou num- report usj:ng ih¢ traditionalmethod ber for the 'trµsr!f the tr11st Will cojl- are eomm0n trti.st ft\nds i\uder SectinuC>to ¢xi st, evert ifthe tr11stpre' tion5S4(a) anc! tt'tiSts t:hatarMwhe
and the entire trust continues to

This method is avri.i!able where ihe txnsteither.has a·single owner t.lt !j1\1ltiple owtlers,

FAQ3 .. Wbett 1$ a g.rattfo\ trust required, fQ get; a t(lXpayer identi' ffcafl'on tttmiber? A trnsteet\ll'lt .tepl)tts u$fogthetra" ditionalmethod otth~ secotid a[ter0 nafrv• method is teqqlred to obntin a ta)<'payetidenti~kation nUlilber

repott· under the.. s~me taxpa,yer identification nutl>ber. For ellam" pl~, (fa trust,·rep()rtlng under th¢

11 Saa A•g.1:e7i-.t(b)t5); 12 ·R~gs,.soi . s1.o·s~·1{a)~)··anct ($), fa H•~S.1;671'4(b)(6)Md (7). · •.• RajJ.J .a114(g), " $eal'l~g. ,1 ;57)•4(b)($);

priate information or by ide1;tifr-

al method, the trust.ee may change to one the alternative methods by filing a final Form 1041 for the tax year, and in the subsequent tax year, the trustee may report under one of the alternative methods. The trustee muSt incl!fde the following on thdinal Jlonn.1041: "Pursuant to Treas.ur.y Regulation Sec· tion 1.671-4(g), this is the final form i 041 for this grantor trust." lf the trustee has previously reported under one of the alternative methods, the .trns.tee may change to the traditional method. If the trustee had reported under the first alternative meth9d, the trus~ee must fi\rni~hthe riame, taxpayer identlficati•on number, arid address oJ th.e trust to all pay.ors for subsequent tax years. If the trustee had reported under the secoud alternative method, the trus.tee must indlcate on each Form 1096 that it files for the final tax year for which the trustee so reports that it is the final return of the trust. Similarly, the ttu$tee may switch between a1tern11tive .methods by providing aH pay.ors the appro-

of

ing l\ firial Fo~m 1096 as slleh. '• F1\. Q 6.• Are there special considerations when a husband a'lid

wife are both settlors of a trust~ As noted above in FAQ 1, .oue of the challenges when a husbanda.nd wHe are the. joint Settlors .oh tJ:ust is determiningwhether one o;: h.oth :are treated as .owuers.ofthetrust. When only one spouse ls the owner of the .trust, no add.itiorwl issues need to be considered merely bee ause the owner is married. The' items of inc.ome, d<>du
trust reporting, a tt!l$t th!lti$ treat· ed as.beiµgy,rhpl)y owned by a ma.tried co11ple cliat files joiritly is t!'eat· ¢d as beirig ow·ned by a. single grantor. '' If the couple files sepa· rately, it is necessary t{) determine in whatpropofrion each spo.use is treated as the owner of the trnst. Tbis will he. f fu!lction of the value of the assets that each has trans• foiredto the trust, whfoh may. Med to.be determined on a year-ro·year basis as additiorial assets are traus· fer red, Tl1e .items. ofincoiUe, cleduction, and credit can then be allo· cared to each spouse in p:rope>rt(on to thecowne~ship ofthe trui;t, FAQ 1. Do special rules apply if

nan·U.S. persons, trust$; or.assets are ~nvoh;ed? The ta;\ tep.orting. obligations for a gran;or trust become more complex where non-V.S. activities. \)r persoris are invqlved. Ofcourse, as a threshold matter, it is important to confir.m one is actually dealing with a grantor trust. When the grani:or is a no11-U.S. person, spe<::ialtules uad¢t Sec\ion <'72(£)(2.l .limit .the applicati0 nqf the ,;ranfor t)'.t1Stniles

REPRINTS. 1'f'•••:t•••••,,, NEW SERVICE FOR WG&L SUBSCRl!tERS Th.e pi'O.tbsS:inuru Y?a:r to sluµ'~ to.4ats bes~·fhlnking l)n cru.cl.al:tQp~c~,:with 'fOUl' CQllea~s and cllents, Now· it'& Cai-)' f0~- you t:o obtaiO. .a,ffo~bk, _pro:fesaionaUy _Qotind ci?,Pks Qr" especially pertin~_t!l
_by leadµig_it1dustry- experts •Keep up With·new-developmenta - and how they affeCt you and yo:ur company

•'Enhance jn~l10use ·U>ainlii.g- programs • Promote your produCtS or services by Offering cqpiea to cllerit::i

•Aud muoh more Fo1• addltiottal infDx:matWn about WG&J:,.Jttprints 01".to piac(} l.lll order for ·.100 copJes o;i;' m,ore1 mail the coup(}i::\,oT·Qiµlt 0

1·973·942-5716 •REPRINTS P-1.ease fei'.lle:t:\lti_c;.r·that_ ari:.icles '*Pearingin thisjqu_rnal may nq't be .reproduced·wltl:,t0:utpqnuisiQn of the publisher.- B;>l' 9.rcie:rs 9f fow_er than WO teprlnts, Clill the Copyright Clea:rante C:enrer at97M50-8400.

AUGUST 2012

VOL 39 I

Nd

e

\J

2117/2015

IRS Identifies Non-Filers Using State Property Records-www.forbes.com

for bes.com

IRS Identifies Non-Filers Using State Property Records Oct. 19, 2011 • 4 min read • original

https://www.readability.com/articles/kjhb8wbh

1/1()

IRS Identifies

2/17/2015

Non~Fi!ers

Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

Gallery: Gift Taxes--The Other Tax Return

https://www.readability.com/articles/kihb8wbh

IRS Identifies Non-Filers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2/17/2015

Gallery: 15 Ways To Invite An IRS Audit A new IRS gift tax compliance initiative responds to suspicions of widespread failure to file gift tax returns. According to Josephine Bonaffini, the Federal/State Coordinator for the IRS Estate and Gift Tax Program, between sixty percent and ninety percent of taxpayers fail to file a gift tax return despite having engaged in a https://www.readability.com/articles/kjhb8wbh

'.l.11n

IRS Identifies Noh~Fi!ers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2117/2015

transaction requiring a return. Although gift tax audits are historically rare, the IRS has examined hundreds of taxpayers in the last two years whom the IRS suspects made large gifts, yet failed to file the appropriate returns. Borrowing from techniques long employed to identify noncompliant taxpayers in the income tax context, the IRS is using records obtained from third parties-namely, land records maintained in state and county offices-to root out intra-family land transfers for little or no consideration. Land records maintained at local state offices are publicly available. However, the suspect transfers make up a small percentage of these voluminous and decentralized records. Thus, the IRS has asked state and county agencies that compile the relevant records to provide the IRS with those records. For instance, the California constitution contains cap on property tax increases following certain intra-family transfers, which inadvertently results in the California Board of Equalization ("BOE") segregating the records of interest to the IRS-those on intra-family transfersfrom the mass of irrelevant property records.

httos ://www .readabil itv. com/arti cl es/ki hb8wbh

A/1n

IRS Identifies Non~Fi!ers Using State Property Records -www.-forbes.com

2/17/2015

State or county agencies in fifteen states, including New York and Texas, have voluntarily agreed to provide records similar to those maintained by the California BOE. There is no reason to believe that the IRS has not made similar requests to agencies within many more, if not all, states, and more voluntary compliance from individual states may be forthcoming. The recent flurry of gift tax compliance activity took many in the tax community by surprise. The compliance initiative received no appreciable public attention until the recent dispute in California federal court (discussed in more detail below), and the IRS has declined to comment on the initiative beyond the information provided in documents filed in that case. This mysterious quality gives the IRS's recent activity the aura of a "stealth" program. As with any federal tax law violation, the government may impose severe consequences for violating the gift tax provisions. But one curious aspect of the new gift

https:/lwww,readability.com/articles/kjhbBwbh

IRS ldentlfies Non-Filers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2117/2015

tax compliance initiative is that the majority of examinations likely result in zero assessed tax or penalties. According to Bonaffini, in the past two years, 323 taxpayers have been audited for failure to file gift tax returns relating to gifts of real property, 217 cases were still under examination, and another 250 cases were being researched to determine whether to conduct gift tax audits. At the time, the IRS had determined that ninety-seven taxpayers had violated gift tax reporting requirements by failing to file, and just twelve cases resulted in assessment of tax and penalties. The same statutory regime that governs sanctions for the failure to file income tax and most other returns also governs sanctions for failure to file gift tax returns. Because the Code bases the civil penalty amount on the amount of tax due, failure to file a gift tax return generally results in no penalty if the taxpayer's gifts during the year triggered no tax. However, where a taxpayer does make gifts large enough to trigger gift tax and fails to file a gift tax

https://www.readability.com/articles/kjhb8wbh

B/10

IRS Identifies Non-Filers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2/17/2015

return, such taxpayer cannot "wait it out," hoping that the IRS will fail to assess the tax and penalties while the tax is still enforceable .. Code Section 6501(c)(3) specifies that, "[i]n the case of failure to file a return, the tax may be assessed ... at any time." In addition to the assessment of tax and civil penalties, the government can potentially pursue taxpayers criminally for failure to file a gift tax return. Code Section 7203 criminalizes the willful failure to file a return, and this section has been applied to gift tax returns, albeit infrequently. Although several states apparently complied voluntarily with the IRS' s requests for records, California did not. Rather, when the IRS requested the California BOE produce the neatly segregated records of intra-family transfers discussed above, the BOE refused, citing a state statute which forbids disclosure of personal information absent a court order. The Department of Justice, on behalf of the IRS, filed suit in District Court for the Eastern District of California, naming as defendants "John Does, United htlps://www.readability.com/articles/kjhb8wbh

7/10

IRS Identifies NonRFilers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2117/2015

States taxpayers who, during any part of the period January 1, 2005, through December 21, 2010, transferred real property in the State of California for little or no consideration ... [and for] which information is in the possession of the [BOE]. ..." The initiation of the federal lawsuit allowed the government to petition the court for a summons to serve upon the BOE. The IRS hoped that the court would issue the summons, thereby overcoming the state law which generally prohibits the disclosure of personal information. The Code expressly allows the IRS to petition for a summons "which does not identify the person with respect to whose liability the summons is issued." However, the Code creates three additional hurdles where the government asks for a John Doe summons: the IRS must establish that (i) the summons relates to an investigation of an ascertainable group of people; (ii) there exists a reasonable basis for believing that the group of people may have failed to comply with the Code; and (iii) the records sought are not readily

https ://www .r eadabi Iity .com/artic! es/kj hb8wbh

8/10

IRS Identifies NonRFilers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2/17/2015

available from other sources. In its petition, the government averred that the summons requested satisfied these three requirements. On May 23, 2011, the court issued an order whereby it disagreed with the government and refused to issue the summons. With respect to the third requirement-that the records are not otherwise readily available-the government asserted only that the BOE maintains the relevant records separate from all other property records, that the BOE stated that it could not provide the information without a summons, and that the IRS's only other option was to search through records of all property transactions of all kinds in each of California's fifty-eight counties. But the court noted that taxpayers first file the appropriate forms with their county assessor's office in order to benefit from the tax increase cap following an intra-family transfer, and only later are these forms forwarded to the BOE for centralized recordkeeping. Thus, according to the court, it was unclear why the government could not obtain the requested information directly from the individual counties without having to search through all property records. https J/www .r eadabi Ii ty. com/arti cl es/kj hb8wbh

IRS Identifies NonMFilers Using State Property Records -www.forbes.com

2117/2015

Original URL:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/irswatch/2011/10/19/the-new-gift-tax-audits-irs-identifiesnon-filers-using-state-property-records/

https://www. readability .com/arti cl es/kj hb8wbh

10/10