SEM Halifax Morphy

SEM SUMMIT, Halifax April 28, 2010 Dave Morphy, Vice-Provost (Student Affairs) Peter Dueck, Executive Director, Enrolmen...

0 downloads 65 Views 754KB Size
SEM SUMMIT, Halifax April 28, 2010 Dave Morphy, Vice-Provost (Student Affairs) Peter Dueck, Executive Director, Enrolment Services Neil Marnoch, Registrar Lynn Smith, Executive Director, Student Services

SEM PLANNING HISTORY  2004: The Initial SEM Plan  2007: The Student Affairs SEM Plan  2009: The University Planning Context

2

THE PLANNING CONTEXT  The Strategic Planning Framework  Resource Optimization & Service Enhancement (ROSE)  Optimizing Academic Resources (OARs)

3

OPTIMIZING ACADEMIC RESOURCES (OARs)  Strategic Enrolment Management (SEM)  Academic Synergies and Efficiencies (ASE)  Rules, Regulations and Red Tape (3R’s)

4

MAJOR STEPS IN SEM  Identify key elements of an enrolment plan  Analyze current recruitment and retention strategies  Develop plan, and processes to monitor plan  Develop an implementation timeline

5

Strategic Enrolment Management (SEM) Review: The Framework  To move forward, had to start by creating a more general

SEM framework  Why?  Provides context to inform specifics in the plan  SEM strategy must be informed by the institution’s

mission, values, and planning framework

6

SEM Framework – What We Do  Examines how the U of M is, and needs to be, positioned

both within and outside Manitoba.  In Manitoba – Four Differentiating Characteristics:  Research intensity  Significant graduate programs  A wide range of professional programs  A range and depth of undergraduate programs

 Beyond Manitoba – Compete with other similar

universities, with place in Manitoba as differentiating characteristic 7

IMPLICATIONS OF A DIFFERENTIATED POSITION 

How does this position inform the size of the institution?



How does this position inform the size of our graduate programs?



How does this position impact the role of professional programs?

8

SEM Framework – The Student Experience  Four Fundamental Promises to Students:  Excellent Education

Committed to our students’ academic success  Research Experience  All students will have the opportunity to receive a significant research experience  Community  Opportunities to become engaged in a rich and diverse community both on and off campus  Career Enhancement  Committed to the concept that an undergraduate degree will contribute to life-long learning and the enhancement of students’ career choices 

9

SEM – Recruitment and Retention  What does the Framework imply for Recruitment and

Retention?  What are the Greatest Challenges and Opportunities

we face in both Recruitment and Retention?  By the University?  By Faculty / School / College and their respective  Programs?

10

ACTION PLAN  An Evolving Process  Sub-Committees  SEM Framework  Recruitment  Retention  Student Populations

11

RECRUITMENT SUB-COMMITTEE Mandate:  To consider issues related to student recruitment; and  To develop strategic recommendations

Focus:  Assess optimal enrolment by faculty/program;  Assess target sub population; and  Identify what is distinctive about each faculty/program

for recruitment purposes 12

RETENTION AND SUCCESS SUB-COMMITTEE Mandate:  To consider issues related to retention and student

success; and  To develop strategic recommendations

Focus:  Review student outcomes cohort data  Assess current retention data by faculty/program;  Develop inventory of current retention activity; and

13

SEM IN EVOLUTION  The plan will evolve

 The plan is embedded in the strategic planning process  The plan is embedded in the Office of the Vice-

President (Academic) and Provost  The plan revolves around the experience of building the plan and the sharing of responsibility of developing and implementing the plan 14